24 February 2012 ~ 2 Comments

The Trouble with Oats: Questions and Comments

One reader’s question:  Why does Canada not consider oats a problem? Is it because of different growing/storage practices?

Paul’s comment: Oats are definitely a problem, but the official Canadian definition of gluten free specifies that it is a problem with a solution. Most exports agree that the problem is not the gluten in oats but that the fact that they are usually grown, harvested, and processed in close proximity to wheat, barley, or rye. Oats are considered “certified” if they have been grown and processed in such a way that adding them product does not cause the product to have more than the prescribed number of parts-per-million of  gluten.

The United States does not, as yet, have an official definition of “gluten” but our Food and Drug Administration seems to be going in that direction.

++++++++++++

This is the first in a series of articles that I am calling “Questions and Comments”.  I am using the word ‘comment’ rather than ‘answer’ because these articles will bring up question where there is not total agreement as to a single correct answer. I welcome your comment on my comment or about the  place of oats in the gluten free diet. E-mail me at gfceliac.com@gmail.com. I will publish “Questions and Comments” every Friday.

2 Responses to “The Trouble with Oats: Questions and Comments”

  1. Fatcat 25 February 2012 at 6:33 am Permalink

    I buy the certified gluten free oats. I wish they weren’t so expensive.

    Can anyone tell me if grits (made from corn) also have this issue? I love grits but have avoided them since going gluten free because I was afraid of contamination.

  2. Bette Geraud 1 March 2012 at 8:31 am Permalink

    I had also noticed here in the U.SA how many articles on celiac have NOT had oats on a what you can not eat diet. I for one am not going to eat them except when you are sure you are buying those that were “raised” gluten free.


Leave a Reply